Published 28 April 2026
Northland tōtara
Northland tōtara is one of three sustainably sourced native timbers we work with. It's a naturally regenerating native, harvested on Northland farms under formal approval, milled in Northland, and finished in our Christchurch workshop.
We use this timber for custom dining tables, boardroom tables and Tōtara timber benchtops, depending on stock, size and the character of each board.
This page is the story behind that chain. The history, the law, the land, the people, and what tōtara is like as a timber. Skim the headings for the short version, or read through.
Chapters
From common native to regulated timber
Tōtara was once one of the most common trees in lowland Aotearoa. Māori valued it above nearly every other species. Waka were hollowed from it, whare were framed with it, and many of the country's most treasured carvings were made from it.
When European settlement accelerated in the 1840s, those same qualities made it the default settler timber too. Houses, bridges, wharves, fence posts, all of it. By 1900, mature tōtara had been cleared from most lowland landscapes.
Over the following century the law slowly caught up. The 1993 Forests Amendment Act added Part 3A, which is the main framework governing how indigenous timber can be harvested on private land today. Today there's only a small tōtara industry: a tightly regulated harvest, a research pilot, and a handful of people working to build it back, but in a sustainable way.
More on tōtara's history
Lowland podocarp forest, including tōtara, is among the most reduced vegetation types in New Zealand. One estimate is that only about 1% of the original cover remains.
For Māori, tōtara was a rākau rangatira, a chiefly tree. Large logs were selected for waka taua. Many of the country's most treasured carvings, including pare, poupou, and meeting house elements, are noted as having been made from tōtara. Pātaka and whare were framed with it. Bark sheathed rooves and storage containers. It had a place in rongoā too. Accounts record a tikanga of planting a seedling when a tōtara was felled, to acknowledge Tāne and maintain the resource.
Nineteenth-century settler use was enormous. One published review (RNZIH Journal, 2017) documents around 511,000 tōtara logs milled through 414 sawmills in a single documented period. By 1900, mature tōtara was gone from most lowland landscapes.
Regulatory restriction built slowly. The Maruia Declaration, signed in 1975 and presented to Parliament in 1977, called for protection of remaining native forests and gathered 341,160 signatures. In 1986–87, native forests transferred to the new Department of Conservation. By the late 1990s, most logging of state-owned natural forest had been halted, with the last Crown West Coast operations ending in the early 2000s. The 1993 Forests Amendment Act added Part 3A, which defines sustainable forest management and sets out how indigenous timber can be harvested on private land today.
The pilot project
The Tōtara Industry Pilot, or TIP, was a two-year research pilot based in Northland between 2018 and 2020. Its purpose was simple but ambitious: work out whether a regulated native-timber industry, based on regenerating farm tōtara, could actually work. Technically, economically, and environmentally.
TIP was a collaboration between Te Uru Rākau (MPI's indigenous forestry team), Scion, and three Northland partners: Te Taitokerau Māori Forestry Inc, Tāne's Tree Trust, and Northland Inc. Paul Quinlan and Peter Berg, who you'll meet again later on this page, drove much of the practical work. The kaupapa is "sturdy tōtara, sustainable communities."
The pilot concluded in 2020 and confirmed a viable pathway. Since then, Te Taitokerau Maori Forestry Inc. has been keen to see the work move from study into active commercial harvest on Northland farms, with Māori landowners and entities at the centre. That's the pathway we're building, in partnership with Tāne's Tree Trust, the Northland Tōtara Working Group, and Northland landowners including Tapuaetahi Inc. and Oromahoe Farm Trust.
More on the pilot project
TIP's wider partnership included Northpine alongside the core group, with private landowners and other government agencies involved too. The vision, "He tōtara tūturu, he iwi tū tonu", sits within a Te Taitokerau Māori world view. Strategic goals included building a sustainable land-use industry, collectivising resources for scale, generating and retaining wealth in Taitokerau communities, and building clear provenance stories around the timber.
The pilot harvested and processed around 300 cubic metres of tōtara logs to test the full chain: continuous-cover, low-impact extraction; commercial-scale sawing and kiln-drying; log-to-lumber recovery; costs along the supply chain. Resource assessment was done by Indufor. Financial and business modelling covered several product and market scenarios.
The main findings were that there's sufficient farm (regenerating) tōtara on private and Māori land in Northland to underpin a regional industry, that continuous-cover management with single-tree selection is practical, and that the timber can be processed at commercial scale with good recovery rates.
Main outputs include the TIP Final Summary Report V2.1 (August 2020), a Scion summary brochure, and briefings from Te Uru Rākau / MPI. Phase one concluded in 2020. Since then the work has moved from planning to efforts to develop a functioning supply chain from Northland farms, that delivers on the agreed kaupapa.
Legal native harvesting in NZ
Native timber on private land in New Zealand can only be harvested in accordance with Part 3A of the Forests Act. In practice, that framework is what separates legal native timber from anything else you might come across.
The governing idea is sustainable management (based on maintaining continuous forest cover with the full range of natural values). No clear-felling of native forest. Single trees or small groups are selected and removed. The canopy stays, the forest keeps regenerating, and the stand continues to function as forest, with natural values, indefinitely. That's the principle. The rules around harvest rates, cutting cycles, and protected areas are there to make sure that's what actually happens on the ground.
The indigenous forestry team within Te Uru Rākau, MPI, administers the provisions of the Act. Before any cutting happens, a plan or permit has to be approved. Only registered sawmills can process the timber. MPI advisers can inspect at any point, and every log is tied to a specific approval by docket. It's slow, documented, and specific on purpose.
More on how the framework actually works
Part 3A provides a few approval pathways. The two main ones for commercial harvest are the SFM Plan and the SFM Permit. An SFM Plan is a multi-decade framework for a defined area of indigenous forest, with long-term sustainable cut levels and silviculture prescriptions. An SFM Permit is a shorter instrument, usually covering one or two harvest events over up to ten years. Personal use approvals and milling statements cover smaller, non-commercial situations.
Whichever pathway applies, the conditions bake in continuous cover. Maximum removal per hectare per entry. Minimum residual canopy or basal area. Cutting cycle length. Riparian and steep-slope protection zones. Retention of habitat trees. The intent is that after each cutting cycle the forest is still a functioning forest, with enough regeneration coming through to carry it forward.
Te Uru Rākau indigenous forestry advisers assess applications, review inventory and mapping, visit the site where needed, and recommend conditions before any approval is issued. Post-harvest, they check that felling patterns match the approved plan, that volumes and species align, and that residual stocking and protected areas are intact. Non-compliance can trigger prosecutions, remedial action, infringements, or restrictions on future approvals.
On the mill side, indigenous timber can only be processed at a registered sawmill, and every load is tied to an approved source by docket and return. That chain of custody, from stump to sawbench, is what makes legal native timber legal.
Regeneration across Northland
Northland tōtara isn't a scarce timber in the usual sense. Across the region there are around 200,000 hectares of native scrub and forest on freehold farmland, and tōtara is the predominant canopy tree across much of it. It isn't a remnant. It's regeneration.
Most of it grew back on hill country, erosion-prone slopes, and riparian margins. Not on prime pasture, not planted, not tended. For a lot of Northland farmers, tōtara is simply there, coming up on areas of marginal farm land. Some treat it as a weed.
That's the resource a regulated and sustainable new industry is built on. When continuous-cover harvest does happen, the volume taken in any one entry is small by design. Harvests are controlled to be less than the natural growth increase of the forest, meaning the forest keeps growing in volume. This isn't a race to the bottom of the resource. It's a managed return on something that's been quietly coming back for decades.
More on the Northland resource
Scion, Tāne's Tree Trust, and the Northland Tōtara Working Group have been studying farm tōtara for years. The resource is large and uneven. Stands vary a lot in density, form, and age depending on when the land was cleared and regeneration started.
There's no single regional inventory number for standing tōtara volume. Estimates are built from the bottom up, farm by farm, using stand sampling and indigenous volume tables. What's well documented is the silvicultural response to management. Dense regenerating pole stands thinned to lower stocking grow significantly faster in volume and diameter than unthinned stands, and with much lower mortality. Well-managed farm tōtara grows faster than unmanaged native forests.
Worth flagging what this isn't. It isn't harvesting from old-growth forest, from protected native bush, or from the conservation estate. Those are off-limits. The Part 3A framework applies to existing and regenerating native forest on private land, and Northland's farm tōtara sits squarely in the regenerating category.
The people and the land
Our tōtara comes from two Northland farms and three working relationships. The land is held by Tapuaetahi Incorporation, on the Purerua Peninsula in the Bay of Islands, and Oromahoe Farm Trust. Both are working farms, held through Māori incorporation and trust structures, where tōtara has regenerated strongly across hill country following early land clearances.
On the land side, we work directly with Mariao Hohaia, Executive Manager of Tapuaetahi Incorporation. On the forestry and milling side, with Li Legler of Horowai Timbers, who handles felling, extraction, and milling in Northland. Paul Quinlan, through Tāne's Tree Trust and the Northland Tōtara Working Group, holds the technical and relational chain together, applying decades of work on native forestry to the day-to-day decisions a project like this turns on.
What we buy is tied, log by log, to a specific farm, a specific harvest plan, and specific people who care what happens to the forest afterwards.
It's not a complicated relationship, but it matters. The framing Mariao works within is kaitiakitanga, the guiding principle of his people's relationship with this land. The framing Paul works within is the "He tōtara tūturu, he iwi tū tonu" vision behind the TIP pilot. Our framing is simpler: for an Innate table to have a story worth telling, there has to be environmental outcomes and people upstream whose story is worth linking to. These are those people.
More on the relationships
Guido travelled up to Northland in late March 2026. He spent the day at Te Whangae Farm on Tapuaetahi land and at Oromahoe, walking the stands with Mariao, Li, Paul, and the farm managers. The afternoon was at the Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Rēhia office in Kerikeri, working through the supply agreement. That agreement was signed a couple of weeks later, in April 2026.
Origin of our current stock
In October 2025, Tapuaetahi Incorporation contacted Paul with a problem. A run of tōtara on Te Whangae Farm had been felled under the powerlines. Without a plan, they'd stay on the hill as slash, the leftover trunk and branch material that gets left where it falls. Mariao wondered if they could be salvaged as they had been working towards a project with Innate. Paul came back with a proposal to salvage the usable logs, cut them to length, and get them out. Because the logs were tōtara, any that were to be milled had to sit under the same Part 3A approvals as any other native harvest. Salvage from private land carries no exemption under the Forests Act.
On 10 November 2025 the extraction crew went in. The conditions were hard: big logs, steep ground, slash across the hill from where the trees had been felled. Paul sent through photos that evening. That stock now sits in our timber shed in Christchurch. Every tōtara table we make from this harvest comes from those logs.
Why this matters
For the customer
A tōtara table from us is a piece of furniture and a piece of a chain. You can point to the farm it came from, the people who hold that land, the month it was harvested, and the approval that made the harvest legal. That's not marketing. That's what Part 3A produces, log by log.
For the forest and the farms
When regenerating farm tōtara has economic value as managed timber, something shifts on Northland hill country. The trees become an asset. Landowners have reason to retain and value stands that might otherwise be cleared or left as unmanaged scrub - and even invest in sustainable management.
A commercial harvest isn't a conservation act in itself, but a regulated continuous-cover forestry model is one of the few mechanisms that enables landowners to realise some value from keeping and managing the stands of regenerating native forest on their land. For Māori entities like Tapuaetahi, it also means forestry revenue and work on their land, for their people.
For us and the wider industry
There isn't much of a functioning sustainable native timber industry in New Zealand yet. What exists is small, careful, and reinventing itself after a century of over-cut followed by decades of near-total ban. Every table we make from Northland tōtara is a small signal that there's a market for this timber, produced this way. It supports a future for sustainable indigenous forestry.
We're one small participant, not the centre of anything. But a new, tightly regulated, sustainable native industry needs buyers who'll commit, makers who'll work the timber properly, and projects on the ground to show that it can be done. We want to be all three.
Tōtara as a timber
Northland tōtara is a medium-density timber with a fine, even grain. What we work with is predominantly sapwood, the paler, lighter-toned part of the log. Heartwood is warmer and redder. Both are tōtara, and we use both. The samples pictured show the range.
For a dining table, the properties that matter most are hardness, stability, and durability. Tōtara sits on the softer side of NZ natives: softer than rimu and kauri. Firm enough for daily use and easy to hand-sand and refinish if you ever want to. It moves very little as humidity changes, so wide tops stay flat and joints stay tight.
Historically, tōtara's reputation is built on its heartwood, one of the most durable softwoods in the world, with posts known to last in the ground for decades. Much of that durability comes from totarol, a natural anti-fungal compound unique to tōtara. It's the same resin that underlies a small extractives industry in New Zealand. In a dining room, that kind of durability is over-spec. What matters indoors is stability and longevity under finish, and on both counts tōtara performs well. Our kiln drying and finishing schedule is what carries the sapwood through from raw timber to finished table.
More on how it performs
Technical properties (from Scion and industry sources):
- Density at 12% moisture content: approximately 480 kg/m³. Medium density.
- Janka hardness: around 2.4 kN for heartwood.
- Heartwood durability Class 1 above ground (one of the most durable softwoods worldwide); sapwood Class 2-3, which is one of the reasons we kiln-dry carefully and finish thoroughly.
- Tangential shrinkage under 5%, radial under 3% from green to 12% moisture content. Low movement compared with most cabinet timbers.
- Works cleanly with sharp tools, holds fasteners well, takes oil and wax finishes without fuss.
On sapwood specifically:
- Our stock is around 80% sapwood, 20% heartwood. Both come through the same kiln and finish schedule.
- Sapwood is paler. For customers who prefer a lighter timber over the warmer, redder heartwood, it's often the preferred choice.
- Borer and fungal resistance aren't the drivers they are for exterior uses. Dry timber and a thorough finish do the work.
Compared with other NZ natives:
- Kauri is similar in weight and hardness, but less rot-resistant (mostly a concern outdoors).
- Rimu is similar in weight and slightly harder, with noticeably lower durability and less resistance to borer.
- Red beech is harder than all three, but moves more as it seasons and takes more care to work.
For a dining table, any of the four will work. Tōtara's edge is stability, plus the option of paler sapwood or deeper heartwood depending on preference.
That's the timber, and those are the people it passes through. If you'd like a piece made from it, start with us. Tables, benches, or something custom. We'll walk you through what's on hand, the design, and what it costs.
Living with a tōtara piece
How we finish it
Every tōtara piece we make is finished with Osmo Polyx hard wax oil. It's a penetrating finish, so it soaks into the timber rather than sitting on top. No plastic layer to chip or peel, and small marks can be spot-repaired rather than sanded back and refinished.
An honest note on hardness. Tōtara is softer than some of the other timbers we work with. It will pick up minor dents and marks more readily than West Coast beech, for instance. For tables, chairs, and benches this isn't an issue.
What we like about Osmo on tōtara is that the piece wears in rather than out. A small scratch, a micro-crack in the grain, a nick from a plate sliding off a placemat. Over a few years those become part of the piece, not damage to it.
If you'd like a harder-wearing setup for a particular application, we can talk that through at quote stage.
